Wallachia and Moldavia before the events of 1821
Since 1711 the Romanian Principalities, Wallachia and Moldavia, have come to bow to the Ottoman Empire and pay tribute. Also, the Ottomans installed their political peons as rulers (domni) of the two Principalities, they are known as Phanariotes.
Coming from the chief Greek quarter of Constantinople, known as Phanar, they were among the wealthiest and influential Greek families. In order to rule in Moldavia or Mutenia (Wallachia), they would quite literally buy the function. Once they were ‘domni’ they would also sell the key administrative positions of the country to different aristocrats. Additionally, their income was enormous and it was coming from taxation, known as bir – capitation, a tax every male peasant had to pay beginning with the age of 16, and different other taxes. The main goal of Phanariotes was to gain as much money as possible from the lands they ruled. However, this does not mean that they did not try to improve the well-being of their subjects, they needed healthy workforce, and overall, the Phanariotes started a process of modernization of the Romanian Principalities.
Although, the taxing system, the administrative and cleric institutions where reform in one way or another, the army was almost dissolved. Probably, the Ottomans did not want these two countries to have any military power, perhaps because in the past they were keen to oppose the Turkish plans of expansion. In the same time, the Ottomans encouraged sporadically the forming of a Romanian military presence in the two countries, with the intention to fight the Russians. In any case, we must also consider the possibility that the Phanariote Princes have had a private bodyguard or even private small armies. In Iasi (Moldavia’s capital at that time) or in Bucharest, the Ottoman garrison was definitely unable to stop any invading forces and during the nineteenth century, the number of invasions grew.
One of such army was that of Nicolae Mavrogheni, the great-uncle of Manto Mavrogenous, a heroine of the Greek War of Independence. Nicolae ruled Wallachia during 1786-1790. His army was composed mainly of infantry and cavalry, numbering approximately 11,000 men. During one of the Russian-Austrian-Ottoman conflict, he managed to have some successes against the Russians and the Austrians. However, it may have been that loses were irreplaceable, or other undetermined factors brought a series of defeats. Finally, the breakdown came when the Austrian Army entered Bucharest in November 9, 1790 and Nicolae Mavrogheni was decapitated.
Another attempt for setting up a longeval Romanian army was done by Alexandru Moruzi (Alexander Mourousis). He managed to bring maybe 9,000 men to arms, but it seemed that military training was not applied. Due to probably total absence of discipline – the soldiers started to plunder the lands and cities they where supposed to protect – the army was dissolved from within.
Other attempts in creating a permanent Romanian army have been made by Constantin Hangerli, Alexandru and Constantin Ipsilanti. The last two tried to establish a military force that would act in the interest of the state.
The spark of revolt
In late December or in the first days of 1821, Alexandru Şuţu, the last Phanariote Prince of Wallachia died, perhaps even murdered. This was the perfect scenarios for the boyars to assume control of the country and to bear away the Ottoman suzerainty. Their plans were to work along side Etairia and facilitate the military intervention of Russia in the Balkans.
Etairia, also known as Filiki Eteria, meaning Society of Friends, was a secret society founded in 1816 in Odessa with the purpose to organize and lead the Greek diaspora in an attempt to free Greece from the Ottoman rule. This could be done only in the background of a general uprising of the Balkans and the intervention of the Russian army in the region. In this matter, Etairia has had clear plans for Wallachia and Moldavia. The first was to facilitate the crossing of the Russian troops to the south of the Danube, and Moldavia had several operation points.
Russia also had designs for the Balkans and the two Romanian Principalities. They were keen to expand their influence in the region, even to occupy the territories. In this matter, they encouraged the uprising against the Ottoman Empire by invoking the principle of solidarity between Christians. Additionally, in 1774, the Russia had officially assumed the role of the protector of all Christians in the Ottoman Empire.
As Etairia needed the Romanian Principalities in order to complete their plans of freedom, they initiated Tudor Vladimirescu in the society’s military plans. Tudor Vladimirescu was appointed the leader of the insurrection by the ‘Comitetul de oblăduire” – the interlocutory administration formed after the sudden death of the Phanatiote Prince, Alexandru Şuţu. Tudor and the leader of the Etairia, Iordache si Farmanache, signed an agreement of collaboration.
Tudor Vladimirescu came from a relatively wealthy family. He never pursued any higher education and documents seem to point out that he learn the basics from a ‘condicar’ (writer of some sorts) named Lupu. After that, a ‘higher’ education was received from a family friend. He was never preoccupied with studying the art of war, but he did eventually become a lieutenant in the Russian army during the Russian-Ottoman conflict of 1806-1812. Even more, he received the medal ‘Saint Vladimir’.
The Revolution of 1821
Tudor started the insurrection on January 15, 1821 when he began the march on Bucharest. Camping at Ţânţăreni, his army numbered only about 4000 infantry, made up mostly of ‘panduri’, and 500 cavalry and 2 additional artillery pieces from which one was hardly usable. Through the ‘Proclamation of Tismana’ Tudor Vladimirescu urged the population to arm itself and join the insurrection. The population responded in great number.
The next camp was made at Slatina. Here Tudor’s army was probably 6000 infantry, 2000 cavalry and 3 artillery pieces, the number grew eventually to 8 cannons. Here at Slatina a ‘war council’ was gathered and it approved plans for marching on Bucharest, securing the right flank from a possible Turkish threat and establishing contact with Alexandru Ipsilanti, the leader of Etairia.
The army had a simple, yet efficient, structure of command. The infantry was devided into ‘polcovnicii’ composed of 1000 men each. Every single of the ‘polcovnicii’ was divided into units of 100 named ‘căpitănie’ commanded by a ‘căpitan” (captain) and helped by a ceauş. The cavalry was formed up mostly of ‘arnăuţi’ and ‘panduri’ organized in ‘căpitănii’. As for the weapons, the troops were equipped with rifles, pistols, scythes, bludgeons, axes and iron forks – as most of the combatants were peasants called to arms by Tudor.
By the end of March, the army had arrived in Bucharest. Additionally, Alexandru Ipsilanti also arrived in the capital and a government was established.
The beginning of the end of the Revolution represented the defection of Etairia and Russia which left the Romanian forces extremely vulnerable to an imminent Ottoman invasion. At the same time, the contradictory policy followed by Tudor started to bring to surface the imperfection of his plan. It at this time that Tudor’s position towards the boyars changed. To this event, they were seen as the mean reason for the problems that Wallachia had, alongside the Phanariotes’. Now, Tudor urged the peasants to join forces with the boyars and establish a common front against the Ottomans let by Cara Ahmed Efendi.
However, Tudor’s downfall was clear when the personal correspondence with the above mentioned Turkish leader, the pasha of Silistra was discovered. He was trialed for treason by the Etairia leaders and eventually executed.
The Revolution of 1821 meant a big step forward towards the modernization of the Romanian Principalities and an attempt to resurrect a Romanian army that was dissolved during the Phanariote regime.